On 01/08/16 15:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
On 11/07/16 18:55, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 07/11/2016 04:52 PM, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Based on that, I think that code block is a useful optimisation, we just
need
to take care with immediates.
What do you think?
Yeah, I think the patch is ok.
This patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg00017.html) has been
in trunk
for a month with no reported problems.
I'd like to backport it to the GCC 5 and 6 branches.
I've bootstrapped and tested it there on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
Sorry for the early ping but given that GCC 6.2 is due shortly and I'm away
next week,
could I please backport this patch to the GCC 6 branch?
Thanks,
Kyrill
Ok?
Thanks,
Kyrill
Bernd
