The -Wlogical-not-parentheses deliberately doesn't warn when the RHS has
boolean type.  But since in C the type of a comparison is int, we need
to check for tcc_comparison, too.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and ppc64le-redhat-linux, ok for trunk?

2016-08-24  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c/77292
        * c-common.c (warn_logical_not_parentheses): Don't warn if RHS is
        a comparison.

        * c-c++-common/Wlogical-not-parentheses-1.c: New test.

diff --git gcc/c-family/c-common.c gcc/c-family/c-common.c
index 3feb910..47255c3 100644
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.c
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.c
@@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ warn_tautological_cmp (location_t loc, enum tree_code 
code, tree lhs, tree rhs)
 
 /* Warn about logical not used on the left hand side operand of a comparison.
    This function assumes that the LHS is inside of TRUTH_NOT_EXPR.
-   Do not warn if RHS is of a boolean type.  */
+   Do not warn if RHS is of a boolean type, or a comparison.  */
 
 void
 warn_logical_not_parentheses (location_t location, enum tree_code code,
@@ -1489,7 +1489,8 @@ warn_logical_not_parentheses (location_t location, enum 
tree_code code,
 {
   if (TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) != tcc_comparison
       || TREE_TYPE (rhs) == NULL_TREE
-      || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (rhs)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE)
+      || TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (rhs)) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
+      || TREE_CODE_CLASS (TREE_CODE (rhs)) == tcc_comparison)
     return;
 
   /* Don't warn for !x == 0 or !y != 0, those are equivalent to
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wlogical-not-parentheses-1.c 
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wlogical-not-parentheses-1.c
index e69de29..4ae9ec2 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wlogical-not-parentheses-1.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wlogical-not-parentheses-1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+/* PR c/77292 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Wlogical-not-parentheses" } */
+
+ /* Test that we don't warn if rhs is a comparison.  */
+
+int
+foo (int a, int b)
+{
+  int r = 0;
+  r += !a == (a < b);
+  r += !a == (a > b);
+  r += !a == (a >= b);
+  r += !a == (a <= b);
+  r += !a == (a != b);
+  r += !a == (a == b);
+  return r;
+}

        Marek

Reply via email to