Case gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c uses unsigned long at the moment which can't be 
vectorized on Sparc64.  This patch revises it by using unsigned int.  I think 
it's an obvious change.
Test result checked, is it OK?


2016-09-15  Bin Cheng  <bin.ch...@arm.com>

        * gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c: Use unsigned int instead of unsigned long.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c       (revision 240166)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr57558-1.c       (working copy)
@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
 /* { dg-require-effective-target vect_int } */
-typedef unsigned long ul;
-void foo (ul* __restrict x, ul* __restrict y, ul n)
+typedef unsigned int u_int;
+void foo (u_int* __restrict x, u_int* __restrict y, u_int n)
-  ul i;
+  u_int i;
   for (i=1; i<=n; i++, x++, y++)
     *x += *y;

Reply via email to