On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:13:41AM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 09/21/2016 01:09 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> > I thought I remember discussing this macro with you, but see what was
> > checked in I'll believe I'm thinking of something similar but different.
> I think this here was an earlier patch and the one we were discussing
> recently was the other macro with a similar name.
> > Any way sorry about the dumb bug
> Stuff like this happens, no worries. But I've seen it happen a lot over the
> years, and maybe you can see in this an explanation of why I'm often not the
> most enthusiastic supporter of pure cleanup patches (those not motivated by
> more substantial patches depending on them).
yeah, there's always some risk, though I also believe if you define
something as cleaning up then it has some value compared to pointless
permutation. Ironically I think one of the big motivating reasons to
remove ifdefs is to remove a source of bustage.