On 09/27/2016 03:41 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Sep 27, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/27/2016 10:39 AM, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:40:22PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Hi,
This patch requires int32plus for
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-1.c, as it reports a bunch of
failures for a 16 bit int target like the avr. The "%u" format
specifier tests, for example, use int literals big enough to only fit
in a long int, and this causes unexpected warnings.
Comitted to trunk.
This change is obviously incomplete as it does not update the expected
line numbers for warnings generated by this testcase.
Right.
It does make me wonder if these directives could go at the bottom of the file
so that adding/removing a directive doesn't require updating line #s in the
file.
We support relative numbers in some of the places now, right? :-) absolute
line numbers should be recoded to relative numbers as people hit them.
Yea, that's probably an even better solution.
jeff
