On 10/03/2016 03:03 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: > Hi Martin, > >> On 09/30/2016 02:31 PM, Rainer Orth wrote: >>> this would be i386-pc-solaris2.12. I'm not sure if the constructor >>> priority detection works in a cross scenario. >>> >>> I'm attaching the resulting assembly (although for Solaris as, the gas >>> build is still running). >> >> Hi. Sorry, I have a stupid mistake in dtor priority >> (I used 65534 instead of desired 99). Please try to test it on Solaris 12 >> with the attached patch. I'll send the patch to ML soon. > > unfortunately, the patch makes no difference on Solaris 12. The test > even FAILs when using gas/gld, which is a different/independent > implementation of constructor priority.
Ok, can you please send me x.S file for Solaris 12? > >> Can you please test whether it makes any change on a solaris target w/o >> prioritized ctors/dtors? > > It doesn't: the test PASSes on Solaris 10 and 11 with and without your > patch. I see, that would require the former approach using atexit, which would be chosen depending on whether target supports prioritized dtors or not. Martin > > Rainer >
