On 09/09/16 15:32, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > On 27/05/16 15:51, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >> Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>> On 07/04/16 10:30, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>>> On 17/03/16 16:33, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>>>> On 23/10/15 12:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>>>>> On 10/12/2015 11:58 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Index: gcc/configure.ac >>>>>>> =================================================================== >>>>>>> --- gcc/configure.ac (revision 228530) >>>>>>> +++ gcc/configure.ac (working copy) >>>>>>> @@ -1993,7 +1993,7 @@ elif test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; t >>>>>>> fi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> if test x$host != x$target || test "x$TARGET_SYSTEM_ROOT" != x; then >>>>>>> - if test "x$with_headers" != x; then >>>>>>> + if test "x$with_headers" != x && test "x$with_headers" != xyes; then >>>>>>> target_header_dir=$with_headers >>>>>>> elif test "x$with_sysroot" = x; then >>>>>>> >>>>>>> target_header_dir="${test_exec_prefix}/${target_noncanonical}/sys-include" >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm missing the beginning of this conversation, but this looks like a >>>>>> reasonable change (avoiding target_header_dir=yes for --with-headers). >>>>>> So, approved. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bernd >>>>>> >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I was wondering why this never made it to trunk. I am currently running >>>>> into an issue that this patch would fix. >> >> Seems I never actually checked this in, even though it was approved. >> Thanks for the reminder, I've now checked the patch in. >> >> Bye, >> Ulrich >> > > Is it OK to backport this fix to GCC-6? It applies cleanly, builds and > no regressions for arm-none-eabi. > > Regards, > Andre > Ping.