Whoops.  Discovered I had inadvertently left in a comment that made no
sense when fixing PR77916.  This patch removes it.  Committed as obvious.


2016-10-17  Bill Schmidt  <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

        * gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (record_increment): Remove
        garbage comment.

Index: gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c
--- gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (revision 241281)
+++ gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (working copy)
@@ -2507,9 +2507,7 @@ record_increment (slsr_cand_t c, widest_int increm
         as providing an initializer (if it does); we will revise this
         opinion later if it doesn't dominate all other occurrences.
          Exception:  increments of 0, 1 never need initializers;
-        and phi adjustments don't ever provide initializers.  Note
-         that we only will see an increment of -1 here for pointer
-        arithmetic (otherwise we will have an initializer).  */
+        and phi adjustments don't ever provide initializers.  */
       if (c->kind == CAND_ADD
          && !is_phi_adjust
          && c->index == increment

Reply via email to