Whoops. Discovered I had inadvertently left in a comment that made no
sense when fixing PR77916. This patch removes it. Committed as obvious.
2016-10-17 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (record_increment): Remove
--- gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (revision 241281)
+++ gcc/gimple-ssa-strength-reduction.c (working copy)
@@ -2507,9 +2507,7 @@ record_increment (slsr_cand_t c, widest_int increm
as providing an initializer (if it does); we will revise this
opinion later if it doesn't dominate all other occurrences.
Exception: increments of 0, 1 never need initializers;
- and phi adjustments don't ever provide initializers. Note
- that we only will see an increment of -1 here for pointer
- arithmetic (otherwise we will have an initializer). */
+ and phi adjustments don't ever provide initializers. */
if (c->kind == CAND_ADD
&& c->index == increment