> On Nov 17, 2016, at 3:42 AM, Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:14 AM, Bill Schmidt > <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, the new predicate works fine. New patch below, bootstrapped and tested >> on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu, with only the bb-slp-cond-1.c regressions >> previously discussed. Is this ok for trunk? > > Yes. Please open a bug for the bb-slp-cond-1.c testsuite FAIL (so we have an > excuse to either improve loop vectorization data dependence analysis or > BB vectorization in stage3).
Fix committed as r242550, new bug open at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78396. Thanks! Bill > > Thanks, > Richard.
