On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:55:58PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 11:57 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 03:20:08PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 11/29/2016 12:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >>>The x86_64 stv pass uses PUT_MODE to change REGs and MEMs in place to
> >>>all setters and users, but that is undesirable in debug insns which are
> >>>intentionally ignored during the analysis and we should keep using correct
> >>>modes (TImode) instead of the new one (V1TImode).
> >>Note that MEMs are not shared, so twiddling the mode on any given MEM
> >>changes one and only one object.
> >Note that this patch isn't trying to workaround any wrong MEM sharing,
> >while the other patch has been. So, is the PR78575 ok as is?
> >I'll post the other updated patch in the corresponding thread.
> It was an x86 patch, right? So it's Uros's call.
Yeah, it is config/i386/ only.