On 12/12/16 14:20, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
> On 21/06/16 15:16, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> After some changes to GCC this test no longer tests the desired code
>> generation behavior. The generated assembly is better than it used to
>> be, but it has become too smart. I add an extra parameter to make sure
>> GCC can't optimize away the loop.
>>
>> Tested for arm-none-eabi-gcc with a Cortex-M3 target.
>>
>> Is this OK?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andre
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog
>> 2016-06-21 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com>
>>
>> * gcc.target/arm/unsigned-extend-2.c: Update testcase.
>>
>
> Ping.
>
Ping.
