On 06/01/17 15:47, Jeff Law wrote: > On 01/06/2017 03:53 AM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >> On 09/12/16 16:31, Bernd Schmidt wrote: >>> On 12/09/2016 05:16 PM, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>> >>>> Regardless, 'reload_cse_simplify' would never perform the opposite >>>> transformation. It checks whether it can replace anything within the >>>> first argument INSN, with the second argument TESTREG. As the name >>>> implies this will always be a register. I double checked, the function >>>> is only called in 'reload_cse_regs' and 'testreg' is created using >>>> 'gen_rtx_REG'. >>> >>> Ok, let's go ahead with it. >>> >>> >>> Bernd >>> >> Hello, >> >> Is it OK to backport this (including the testcase fix) to gcc-6-branch? >> >> Patches apply cleanly and full bootstrap and regression tests for >> aarch64- and arm-none-linux-gnueabihf. Regression tested for >> arm-none-eabi. > Yes, that should be fine to backport to the active release branches. > > jeff OK, I have committed the backports to gcc-5 and gcc-6 branches.
Cheers, Andre
