[Dave replied privately that PA-RISC is OK too]. > I'd say let's not have a middle ground - this stuff is sufficiently > brain-twisting that I'd rather go back to a known working state. If > there was an error in the previous patch, let's roll it back until we > fully understand the situation.
See the audit trail of the PR, in particular comment #24: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78468#c24 In other words, the issue is more general than just STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET. -- Eric Botcazou
