On 31 January 2017 00:19:46 CET, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So I see the introduction of many >> >> if (const OP object) expressions >> >> Can you please fix those as an independent patch after #4 and #5 are >> installed on the trunk? Consider that patch pre-approved, but please >> post it here for the historical record. >> >> I think a regexp of paren followed by a constant would probably take >you >> to them pretty quickly. > >I committed the attached patch in r245040.
The majority of these are not equivalent and I'm curious why they aren't? TIA,
