Ping!

this time with correct PR number: 79229.

On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 08:31:22 +0100
Andre Vehreschild <ve...@gmx.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> attached patch fixes the issue of 79229 (which is not a regression).
> The issue was that the code generating the checking was expecting a
> pointer type, but got an indirect ref to it. This is fixed now.
> 
> Bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-linux/f25. Ok for trunk?
> 
> Regards,
>       Andre


-- 
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de 
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2017-02-07  Andre Vehreschild  <ve...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/79229
        * gfortran.dg/class_allocate_24.f90: New test.


gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

2017-02-07  Andre Vehreschild  <ve...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/79229
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_trans_assignment_1): Deref indirect refs when
        compiling with -fcheck=mem to check the pointer and not the data.

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
index 138af56..fcd6f16 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
@@ -9959,13 +9959,16 @@ gfc_trans_assignment_1 (gfc_expr * expr1, gfc_expr * expr2, bool init_flag,
 	  tree cond;
 	  const char* msg;
 
+	  tmp = INDIRECT_REF_P (lse.expr)
+	      ? gfc_build_addr_expr (NULL_TREE, lse.expr) : lse.expr;
+
 	  /* We should only get array references here.  */
-	  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (lse.expr) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
-		      || TREE_CODE (lse.expr) == ARRAY_REF);
+	  gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (tmp) == POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
+		      || TREE_CODE (tmp) == ARRAY_REF);
 
 	  /* 'tmp' is either the pointer to the array(POINTER_PLUS_EXPR)
 	     or the array itself(ARRAY_REF).  */
-	  tmp = TREE_OPERAND (lse.expr, 0);
+	  tmp = TREE_OPERAND (tmp, 0);
 
 	  /* Provide the address of the array.  */
 	  if (TREE_CODE (lse.expr) == ARRAY_REF)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_24.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_24.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..883247d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/class_allocate_24.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-options "-fcheck=mem" }
+! 
+! Compile time check only, to test that the ICE is fixed in the assignment of the
+! default initializer of the class to sf.
+
+implicit none
+
+type :: t
+  integer, pointer :: data => null ()
+end type
+
+class(t), dimension(:), allocatable :: sf
+allocate (t :: sf (1))
+end
+

Reply via email to