This patch fixes an ICE-on-invalid where we redefine a function whose prototype
parameter list contains error_mark_node, which then causes a crash in
store_parm_decls_oldstyle.  Fixed by adding yet another error_mark_node check.

While at it, I fixed wrong formatting in the nearby code.  Also use NULL_TREE
instead of 0 where appropriate.  I really dislike those zeros-as-trees; one
day I'll just go and turn them into NULL_TREEs.

I also fixed missing TREE_VALUE (), which is what I think was intended there.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?

2017-03-02  Marek Polacek  <pola...@redhat.com>

        PR c/79758
        * c-decl.c (store_parm_decls_oldstyle): Check if the element of
        current_function_prototype_arg_types is error_mark_node.  Fix
        formatting.  Add TREE_VALUE.

        * gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c: New test.

diff --git gcc/c/c-decl.c gcc/c/c-decl.c
index 32edacc..e3bf898 100644
--- gcc/c/c-decl.c
+++ gcc/c/c-decl.c
@@ -8965,12 +8965,15 @@ store_parm_decls_oldstyle (tree fndecl, const struct 
c_arg_info *arg_info)
       tree type;
       for (parm = DECL_ARGUMENTS (fndecl),
             type = current_function_prototype_arg_types;
-          parm || (type && TREE_VALUE (type) != error_mark_node
-                   && (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_VALUE (type)) != 
void_type_node));
+          parm || (type != NULL_TREE
+                   && TREE_VALUE (type) != error_mark_node
+                   && TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_VALUE (type)) != void_type_node);
           parm = DECL_CHAIN (parm), type = TREE_CHAIN (type))
        {
-         if (parm == 0 || type == 0
-             || TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_VALUE (type)) == void_type_node)
+         if (parm == NULL_TREE
+             || type == NULL_TREE
+             || (TREE_VALUE (type) != error_mark_node
+                 && TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (TREE_VALUE (type)) == void_type_node))
            {
              if (current_function_prototype_built_in)
                warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (fndecl),
@@ -8996,7 +8999,7 @@ store_parm_decls_oldstyle (tree fndecl, const struct 
c_arg_info *arg_info)
             declared for the arg.  ISO C says we take the unqualified
             type for parameters declared with qualified type.  */
          if (TREE_TYPE (parm) != error_mark_node
-             && TREE_TYPE (type) != error_mark_node
+             && TREE_TYPE (TREE_VALUE (type)) != error_mark_node
              && ((TYPE_ATOMIC (DECL_ARG_TYPE (parm))
                   != TYPE_ATOMIC (TREE_VALUE (type)))
                  || !comptypes (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (DECL_ARG_TYPE (parm)),
@@ -9017,7 +9020,7 @@ store_parm_decls_oldstyle (tree fndecl, const struct 
c_arg_info *arg_info)
                  if (targetm.calls.promote_prototypes (TREE_TYPE 
(current_function_decl))
                      && INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (parm))
                      && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (parm))
-                     < TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node))
+                        < TYPE_PRECISION (integer_type_node))
                    DECL_ARG_TYPE (parm)
                      = c_type_promotes_to (TREE_TYPE (parm));
 
diff --git gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c 
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c
index e69de29..aeaf7c7 100644
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/noncompile/pr79758.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* PR c/79758 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+
+void fn1 (int[a]) { }; /* { dg-error "undeclared here|parameter name omitted" 
} */
+void fn1 (b) { }; /* { dg-error "redefinition" } */
+/* { dg-warning "defaults to 'int'" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 } */

        Marek

Reply via email to