Don't let pointer randomization change the order in which we process
store chains.  This may cause SSA_NAMEs to be released in different
order, and if they're reused later, they may cause differences in SSA
partitioning, leading to differences in expand, and ultimately to
different code.

bootstrap-debug-lean (-fcompare-debug) on i686-linux-gnu has failed in
haifa-sched.c since r245196 exposed the latent ordering problem in
store merging.  In this case, the IR differences (different SSA names
selected for copies in out-of-SSA, resulting in some off-by-one
differences in pseudos) were not significant enough to be visible in
the compiler output.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu.  Ok to install?

for  gcc/ChangeLog

        * gimple-ssa-store-merging.c (INCLUDE_MAP): Define.
        (struct imm_store_chain_info): Add seqno field and ctor parm.
        (class pass_store_merging): Add m_store_seq field.
        (pass_store_merging::terminate_and_process_all_chains):
        Iterate over m_store_seq.
        (pass_store_merging::terminate_all_aliasing_chains):
        Likewise.
        (pass_store_merging::terminate_and_release_chain):
        Erase the m_store_seq entry.
        (pass_store_merging::execute): Check for debug stmts first.
        Compute seqno, add the m_store_seq entry.
---
 gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c |   58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c b/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
index 17ac94a..0bf7d89 100644
--- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
+++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
   [p + 4B] (16-bit) := 0xabcd;     //  val & 0x00000000ffff;  */
 
 #include "config.h"
+#define INCLUDE_MAP
 #include "system.h"
 #include "coretypes.h"
 #include "backend.h"
@@ -675,11 +676,12 @@ merged_store_group::apply_stores ()
 
 struct imm_store_chain_info
 {
+  unsigned seqno;
   tree base_addr;
   auto_vec<struct store_immediate_info *> m_store_info;
   auto_vec<merged_store_group *> m_merged_store_groups;
 
-  imm_store_chain_info (tree b_a) : base_addr (b_a) {}
+  imm_store_chain_info (unsigned seq, tree b_a) : seqno (seq), base_addr (b_a) 
{}
   bool terminate_and_process_chain ();
   bool coalesce_immediate_stores ();
   bool output_merged_store (merged_store_group *);
@@ -718,6 +720,18 @@ public:
 private:
   hash_map<tree_operand_hash, struct imm_store_chain_info *> m_stores;
 
+  /* Use m_store_seq to order elements in m_stores, and iterate over
+     them in a predictable way.  It maps sequence numbers to the base
+     addresses stored as keys in m_stores.  Using this order avoids
+     extraneous differences in the compiler output just because of
+     tree pointer variations (e.g. different chains end up in
+     different positions of m_stores, so they are handled in different
+     orders, so they allocate or release SSA names in different
+     orders, and when they get reused, subsequent passes end up
+     getting different SSA names, which may ultimately change
+     decisions when going out of SSA).  */
+  std::map<unsigned, tree> m_store_seq;
+
   bool terminate_and_process_all_chains ();
   bool terminate_all_aliasing_chains (imm_store_chain_info **,
                                      bool, gimple *);
@@ -730,11 +744,16 @@ private:
 bool
 pass_store_merging::terminate_and_process_all_chains ()
 {
-  hash_map<tree_operand_hash, struct imm_store_chain_info *>::iterator iter
-    = m_stores.begin ();
   bool ret = false;
-  for (; iter != m_stores.end (); ++iter)
-    ret |= terminate_and_release_chain ((*iter).second);
+  for (std::map<unsigned, tree>::iterator next = m_store_seq.begin (),
+        iter = next; iter != m_store_seq.end (); iter = next)
+    {
+      next++;
+      tree base_addr = (*iter).second;
+      ret |= terminate_and_release_chain (*m_stores.get (base_addr));
+    }
+  gcc_assert (m_stores.elements () == 0);
+  gcc_assert (m_store_seq.empty ());
 
   return ret;
 }
@@ -799,15 +818,17 @@ pass_store_merging::terminate_all_aliasing_chains 
(imm_store_chain_info
        }
     }
 
-  hash_map<tree_operand_hash, struct imm_store_chain_info *>::iterator iter
-    = m_stores.begin ();
-
   /* Check for aliasing with all other store chains.  */
-  for (; iter != m_stores.end (); ++iter)
+  for (std::map<unsigned, tree>::iterator next = m_store_seq.begin (),
+        iter = next; iter != m_store_seq.end (); iter = next)
     {
+      next++;
+      unsigned seqno = (*iter).first;
+      tree base_addr = (*iter).second;
+
       /* We already checked all the stores in chain_info and terminated the
         chain if necessary.  Skip it here.  */
-      if (chain_info && (*chain_info) == (*iter).second)
+      if (chain_info && (*chain_info)->seqno == seqno)
        continue;
 
       /* We can't use the base object here as that does not reliably exist.
@@ -815,11 +836,11 @@ pass_store_merging::terminate_all_aliasing_chains 
(imm_store_chain_info
         minimum and maximum offset and the maximum size we could improve
         things here).  */
       ao_ref chain_ref;
-      ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size (&chain_ref, (*iter).first, NULL_TREE);
+      ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_size (&chain_ref, base_addr, NULL_TREE);
       if (ref_maybe_used_by_stmt_p (stmt, &chain_ref)
          || stmt_may_clobber_ref_p_1 (stmt, &chain_ref))
        {
-         terminate_and_release_chain ((*iter).second);
+         terminate_and_release_chain (*m_stores.get (base_addr));
          ret = true;
        }
     }
@@ -835,6 +856,7 @@ bool
 pass_store_merging::terminate_and_release_chain (imm_store_chain_info 
*chain_info)
 {
   bool ret = chain_info->terminate_and_process_chain ();
+  m_store_seq.erase (chain_info->seqno);
   m_stores.remove (chain_info->base_addr);
   delete chain_info;
   return ret;
@@ -1336,6 +1358,9 @@ pass_store_merging::execute (function *fun)
        {
          gimple *stmt = gsi_stmt (gsi);
 
+         if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
+           continue;
+
          if (gimple_has_volatile_ops (stmt))
            {
              /* Terminate all chains.  */
@@ -1346,9 +1371,6 @@ pass_store_merging::execute (function *fun)
              continue;
            }
 
-         if (is_gimple_debug (stmt))
-           continue;
-
          if (gimple_assign_single_p (stmt) && gimple_vdef (stmt)
              && !stmt_can_throw_internal (stmt)
              && lhs_valid_for_store_merging_p (gimple_assign_lhs (stmt)))
@@ -1454,13 +1476,17 @@ pass_store_merging::execute (function *fun)
 
                  /* Store aliases any existing chain?  */
                  terminate_all_aliasing_chains (chain_info, false, stmt);
+                 unsigned next_seqno = m_store_seq.empty () ? 0
+                   : m_store_seq.rbegin()->first + 1;
                  /* Start a new chain.  */
                  struct imm_store_chain_info *new_chain
-                   = new imm_store_chain_info (base_addr);
+                   = new imm_store_chain_info (next_seqno, base_addr);
                  info = new store_immediate_info (bitsize, bitpos,
                                                   stmt, 0);
                  new_chain->m_store_info.safe_push (info);
                  m_stores.put (base_addr, new_chain);
+                 m_store_seq.insert (m_store_seq.end (),
+                                     std::make_pair (new_chain->seqno, 
base_addr));
                  if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
                    {
                      fprintf (dump_file,


-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist|Red Hat Brasil GNU Toolchain Engineer

Reply via email to