Hi Tom! On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:46:19 +0100, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote: > I've run the gcc testsuite for target nvptx-none and ran into "test for > excess errors" FAILs due to: > ... > sorry, unimplemented: target cannot support alloca. > ... > > This patch marks those testcases as requiring alloca.
Thanks! > OK for trunk for stage1? Wouldn't this be good "as obvious" for trunk, right now? (Or are there any potential worries?) > 2017-03-23 Tom de Vries <t...@codesourcery.com> "PR testsuite/80092", I suppose? > * gcc.dg/Walloca-7.c: Add dg-require-effective-target alloca. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-12.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-8.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-4.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-8.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-13.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-9.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-1.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-sprintf-warn-3.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-5.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-10.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-9.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-6.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Wvla-larger-than-1.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr71881.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr71901.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/torture/pr78742.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/builtin-alloc-size.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-2.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-6.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-11.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/attr-alloc_size-7.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Wvla-larger-than-2.c: Same. > * gcc.dg/Walloca-3.c: Same. > * c-c++-common/Wimplicit-fallthrough-7.c: Same. > * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr79413.c: Same. > * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr78439.c: Same. Grüße Thomas
