Thank you for your help. I fixed the test similar to existing sigaction tests.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.c: Fix rounding expand for new pattern.
* config/i386/subst.md: Fix pattern (parallel -> unspec).
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/i386/pr73350-2.c: New test.
Thanks,
Julia
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 10:09 AM
> To: Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>; H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>; GCC
> Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>; Kirill
> Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][X86] Fix rounding pattern similar to PR73350
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com> wrote:
> > I'm so sorry, but I really don't get it. The right result of the test is:
> > Floating
> point exception (core dumped). The wrong result of the test is: nan(no
> exception). If I get an exception(which is right) - the test is failed
> anyway. The
> exception is raised in one instruction, I can't get any intermediate value
> there..
>
> We do have a few testcases catching these cases by installing a signal
> handler (grep for sigaction in testsuite/)
>
> Richard.
>
> > I tried to replaced it with compile time test(attached), which shows, that
> > both
> instruction are generated(not combined) - is it ok?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Julia
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jakub Jelinek [mailto:ja...@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 6:18 PM
> >> To: H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>; GCC Patches <gcc-
> >> patc...@gcc.gnu.org>; Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com>; Kirill Yukhin
> >> <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][X86] Fix rounding pattern similar to PR73350
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:08:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > I would like to, but as far as I know the only testcase possible is
> >> > > below,
> and
> >> as far as I know there is no possibility to use dg-error for runtime
> >> exceptions(Sorry, if I'm wrong). There are only 2 versions of the flag
> exception
> >> or no exception and the error is, when they are combined in CSE.
> >> >
> >> > Can you use
> >> >
> >> > if (wrong)
> >> > abort ();
> >> >
> >> > in testcase?
> >>
> >> Where wrong can also be if (__builtin_fabsf (somefloatval - expectedval) <
> >> epsilon)
> >> or similar if needed. Also, the testcase contains many unnecessary
> >> includes, if you use __builtin_abort, I'd hope you only need x86intrin.h
> >> and
> >> nothing else. And, main can be just int main (), argc and argv aren't
> >> used.
> >> >
> >> > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > >> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
> >> > >> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 3:43 PM
> >> > >> To: Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>
> >> > >> Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Uros Bizjak
> >> > >> <ubiz...@gmail.com>; Kirill Yukhin <kirill.yuk...@gmail.com>
> >> > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH][X86] Fix rounding pattern similar to PR73350
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >> > This is the same issue as PR73350 and PR80862 for disabling FP
> >> exceptions.
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > gcc -O0 -mavx512f -mavx512er returns exception
> >> > >> > gcc -O2 -mavx512f -mavx512er returns nan
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > For this code:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > #include <stdio.h>
> >> > >> > #include <math.h>
> >> > >> > #include <x86intrin.h>
> >> > >> > #include <limits.h>
> >> > >> > #include <float.h>
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
> >> > >> > __m512 a = _mm512_set1_ps((float) -1);
> >> > >> > __m512 b = _mm512_set1_ps((float) -1);
> >> > >> > _mm_setcsr( _MM_MASK_MASK &~
> >> > >> >
> >> > >>
> (_MM_MASK_OVERFLOW|_MM_MASK_INVALID|_MM_MASK_DIV_ZERO)
> >> );
> >> > >> > __m512 result1 = _mm512_rsqrt28_round_ps(a,
> >> _MM_FROUND_NO_EXC );
> >> > >> > printf("%d %d\n", _MM_FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION,
> >> > >> _MM_FROUND_NO_EXC);
> >> > >> > __m512 result2 = _mm512_rsqrt28_round_ps(a,
> >> > >> _MM_FROUND_CUR_DIRECTION);
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > printf("%g\n", result1[0] - result2[0]);
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > return 0;
> >> > >> > }
> >>
> >> Jakub
0001-fix.patch
Description: 0001-fix.patch
