This PR points out that m_elt_size was left uninitialized in the member
initializer list for base_pool_allocator. I think it makes sense to initialize
it like this.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2017-08-02 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
PR other/81667
* alloc-pool.h (base_pool_allocator): Initialize m_elt_size.
diff --git gcc/alloc-pool.h gcc/alloc-pool.h
index a5236db3dae..1d04e5d2cfe 100644
--- gcc/alloc-pool.h
+++ gcc/alloc-pool.h
@@ -240,8 +240,9 @@ base_pool_allocator <TBlockAllocator>::base_pool_allocator (
const char *name, size_t size MEM_STAT_DECL):
m_name (name), m_id (0), m_elts_per_block (0), m_returned_free_list (NULL),
m_virgin_free_list (NULL), m_virgin_elts_remaining (0), m_elts_allocated (0),
- m_elts_free (0), m_blocks_allocated (0), m_block_list (NULL), m_size (size),
- m_initialized (false), m_location (ALLOC_POOL_ORIGIN, false PASS_MEM_STAT) {}
+ m_elts_free (0), m_blocks_allocated (0), m_block_list (NULL), m_elt_size (0),
+ m_size (size), m_initialized (false),
+ m_location (ALLOC_POOL_ORIGIN, false PASS_MEM_STAT) {}
/* Initialize a pool allocator. */
Marek
