On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 04:37:28PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> Jason said (for the C++ part of the patch):
> > About passing parser in or not, I'm happy with the current approach;
> > adding things to the stack isn't free in a highly recursive program
> > like GCC.
> (in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00535.html )
> Jeff: is the C patch OK for trunk (assuming the rest of the kit is
> approved), or were you just reporting that you spot-checked the
> mechanical changes and that you hadn't seen any problems with those?
The C part is ok.