It looks fine to me. OK for trunk.
PS What about PR34640 ?????
On 9 August 2017 at 20:44, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote:
> Am 02.08.2017 um 15:19 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
>> the attached patch is a bit smaller than it looks, because most of
>> it is due to reformatting a large comment. It is rather simple -
>> checking for an incorrectly placed BIND(C) variable was sometimes not
>> done because the test was mixed in with other tests where implicitly
>> typed variables were excluded.
>> Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
> Patch at:
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein