On 10/10/2011 06:23 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Janis Johnson wrote:
> 
>> This patch skips several Power-specific tests if hard_float support
>> isn't available.  OK for trunk?
> 
> It looks like these are testing for particular instructions using FPRs and 
> so powerpc_fprs is more appropriate; you don't want to match e500v2 hard 
> float.

Is a patch using powerpc_fprs instead of hard_float OK for these tests?

Janis

Reply via email to