Hi All,
This patch fixes a regression introduced by r253451.
The target needs all three conditions to be true before it can
vectorize unaligned accesses. This patch turns the erroneous ||
into an &&.
regtested on aarch64-none-elf, arm-none-linux-gnueabihf,
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, armeb-none-linux-gnueabihf and
sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
And for the GCC-7 branch?
Thanks,
Tamar
gcc/testsuite/
2017-10-16 Tamar Christina <tamar.christ...@arm.com>
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c: Correct target selector.
--
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c
index fd7cacb483d9cfbea6d909ba12e67544fa32a190..49e304180e7b01d41a0922b5358d30ae3af88d24 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-multitypes-1.c
@@ -83,5 +83,5 @@ int main (void)
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 2 "vect" { xfail { vect_no_align && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } } */
/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Alignment of access forced using peeling" 2 "vect" { xfail {{ vect_no_align && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } || {vect_sizes_32B_16B }}} } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4 "vect" { xfail {{ vect_no_align && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } || {vect_sizes_32B_16B }}} } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "Vectorizing an unaligned access" 4 "vect" { target { vect_no_align && { {! vect_hw_misalign } && vect_sizes_32B_16B } } }} } */
