> On Oct 11, 2017, at 6:52 AM, Jim Wilson <wil...@tuliptree.org> wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 19:45 +0200, Jim Wilson wrote: >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@linaro.org> >> Date: Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:04 PM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] scheduler bug fix for AArch64 insn fusing >> SCHED_GROUP usage >> To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> >> Cc: Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@linaro.org> >> >> >> ping^2 >> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Jim Wilson <jim.wil...@linaro.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Ping. >>> >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00779.html >>> > > Silly me. I noticed that I am still listed as a sched maintainer, > which means I can self approve this. > > I reverified it with x86_64 and aarch64 bootstraps and make checks. I > also did a C only testsuite run for avr, which appears to be the best > maintained cc0 target. There were no regressions for any of the 3 > targets. > > The patch was applied.
FWIW, the patch looks good. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org
