On Oct 11, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 01:19 PM, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> Tests gcc.target/powerpc/warn-[12].c fail for soft-float multilibs with
>> the unexpected warning "-mvsx requires hardware floating point [enabled
>> by default]". This patch skips those tests for soft-float multilibs and
>> modifies the powerpc check for a soft-float effective target to return
>> true for either __NO_FPRS__ or _SOFT_FLOAT being defined.
>>
>> Is this OK for trunk? I must admit that I'm not sure what all those
>> Power float variants are for.
>
> On second thought these tests should use
>
> /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_vsx_ok } */
>
> instead of requiring hard_float, and forget about the proposed
> change to effective target hard_float. Is that OK?
I was hoping a ppc person would chime in... Ok.
