Committed to 7-branch as revision 254429.
Paul On 5 November 2017 at 12:44, Paul Richard Thomas <paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Andre and Thomas, > > Thanks for looking at this. > > I left the condition as it is because it is the same practice as all > sorts of other parts of gfortran. That said, Thomas's suggestion is I > think the right one. > > Committed revision as revision 254427. 7-branch will come later. > > Regards > > Paul > > On 4 November 2017 at 18:35, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >>> Shouldn't that better be >>> >>> if ((gfc_option.allow_std & GFC_STD_F2003) > 0 >> >> >> I think that >> >> if ((gfc_option.allow_std & GFC_STD_F2003) >> >> would be better - the allow_std field is signed, and >> things could get hariy if we ever have close to 32 >> standards we would like to support. >> >> Hm, come to think of it, is there a special reason to keep >> this signed, or could we just change it to unsigned? >> >> Regards >> >> Thomas > > > > -- > "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" > - Albert Einstein -- "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough" - Albert Einstein
