Hi!

This PR complains that seq_cost counts all non-single_set insns as 1
unconditionally, which is indeed bad.  For some like compare + arithmetics
we even have now code in pattern_cost that handles those reasonably by
default, for others targets have the option through a hook to return
whatever they want.

On the other side, IMNSHO we don't want to count CODE_LABELs, NOTEs,
BARRIERs, DEBUG_INSNs...

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2017-11-29  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR middle-end/80929
        * rtlanal.c (seq_cost): For non-single_set insns try to use insn_cost.

--- gcc/rtlanal.c.jj    2017-10-27 14:16:39.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc/rtlanal.c       2017-11-27 13:35:46.321509933 +0100
@@ -5342,7 +5342,13 @@ seq_cost (const rtx_insn *seq, bool spee
       if (set)
         cost += set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
-      else
-        cost++;
+      else if (NONDEBUG_INSN_P (seq))
+       {
+         int this_cost = insn_cost (CONST_CAST_RTX_INSN (seq), speed);
+         if (this_cost > 0)
+           cost += this_cost;
+         else
+           cost++;
+       }
     }
 
   return cost;

        Jakub

Reply via email to