On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Richard Guenther <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Paolo Carlini > <paolo.carl...@oracle.com> wrote: >> FWIW, I still believe that tweaking the documentation to match the long >> standing reality, would be a small improvement. I'm not going to further >> insist, anyway. > > The original patch is ok. Richard, I don't think it is.
- [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Paolo Carlini
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Richard Guenther
- Re: [C++ Patch] PR 32614 Gabriel Dos Reis