> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:01 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 2:28 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi Uros, > >> > >> Can you take a look at my x86 backend changes so that they are ready > >> to check in once we have consensus. > > > > Please finish the talks about the correct approach first. Once the > > consensus is reached, please post the final version of the patches for > > review. > > A new set of patches are posted at > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01041.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01044.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01045.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01043.html > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg01042.html > > I will submit an additional patch to disallow > -mindirect-branch=/-mfunction-return= > with -mshstk. > > > BTW: I have no detailed insight in these issues, so I'll look mostly > > at the implementation details, probably early next week. > > > > Kernel teams are waiting for the GCC 8 upstream patches. They > have been using my GCC 7 backports for weeks now. Jan, can > you review my patches before Uros has time next week?
I have already read the original series, so I can take a look at the updated ones. Did we get some concensus on how much we want to do in middle-end? Honza > > Thanks. > > > -- > H.J.
