Hi Christophe,
On 23/01/18 13:09, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
On 22 January 2018 at 11:48, Kyrill Tkachov
<kyrylo.tkac...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
Hi all,
This test has needlessly restrictive requirements. It tries to force a
soft-float target and tries to run.
This makes it unsupportable for any non-soft-float variant.
In fact, the test can be a run-time test for any target, and only the
scan-assembler tests are specific to
-mfloat-abi=soft. So this patch makes the test always runnable and makes the
scan-assembler checks predicable
on the the new arm_sotftfloat effective target check.
Unfortunately, the test now fails on armeb-linux-gnueabihf (it used to
be unsupported).
my logs only show:
qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped
:( it runs fine for me on a armeb-none-eabi --with-float=hard target with a
Foundation Model.
Unfortunately I don't have access to an armeb-non-linux-gnueabihf setup.
Could you provide more detailed configuration options so that I can try to
reproduce the
exact -march -m[arm,thumb], -mfpu setup?
Thanks,
Kyrill
on arm-linux-gnueabihf, it's OK (the test was unsupported, but now passes)
Christophe
Committing to trunk.
Thanks,
Kyrill
2018-01-22 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
* doc/sourcebuild.texi (arm_softfloat): Document.
2018-01-22 Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com>
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_arm_softfloat):
New procedure.
* gcc.target/arm/copysign_softfloat_1.c: Allow running everywhere.
Adjust scan-assembler checks for soft-float.
