On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:00:26PM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Koval, Julia <julia.ko...@intel.com> wrote:
> > Yes, you are right, any() is not required. Here is the patch.
>
> Please also attach ChangeLog.
>
> The patch is OK for x86 target, it needs global reviewer approval
> (Maybe Jakub, as the patch touches OMP part).
I don't like the new class name nor header name, bit_mask is way too generic
name for something very specialized (double hwi bitmask).
Richard, any suggestions for this?
Jakub
