On Thu, 25 Jan 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> builtin_memref ctor for a SSA_NAME with non-NULL SSA_NAME_VAR returns
> the underlying variable, rather than just the SSA_NAME.
> Later on the code checks if the bases are equal and then compares
> corresponding offsets.
> 
> The fact that two different SSA_NAMEs have the same underlying variable
> says nothing at all whether they have the same value, as the testcase shows,
> either the SSA_NAMEs can be completely unrelated, or related, but with
> different offsets.  The code already has code to handle POINTER_PLUS_EXPR
> with a constant offset, to look through that.  Perhaps in the future there
> can be other cases we'd special case, but generally we should compare as
> bases the SSA_NAMEs, if they have the same or different base says nothing
> about them.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

OK.

Richard.

> 2018-01-25  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR c/83989
>       * gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c (builtin_memref::builtin_memref): Don't
>       use SSA_NAME_VAR as base for SSA_NAMEs with non-NULL SSA_NAME_VAR.
> 
>       * c-c++-common/Wrestrict-3.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c.jj 2018-01-17 11:54:17.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/gimple-ssa-warn-restrict.c    2018-01-25 14:10:26.182498552 +0100
> @@ -373,9 +373,6 @@ builtin_memref::builtin_memref (tree exp
>                 offrange[1] += off;
>               }
>           }
> -
> -     if (TREE_CODE (base) == SSA_NAME && SSA_NAME_VAR (base))
> -       base = SSA_NAME_VAR (base);
>        }
>  
>    if (size)
> --- gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wrestrict-3.c.jj       2018-01-25 
> 14:16:01.574563425 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Wrestrict-3.c  2018-01-25 14:14:39.273547506 
> +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
> +/* PR c/83989 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -Wrestrict" } */
> +
> +__attribute__((__malloc__)) extern void *my_malloc (__SIZE_TYPE__);
> +void baz (void *);
> +
> +#define SIZE 32
> +
> +void
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  void *recmem = __builtin_malloc (SIZE);
> +  baz (recmem);
> +  while (1)
> +    {
> +      void *oldrecmem = recmem;
> +      recmem = __builtin_malloc (SIZE);
> +      if (!recmem)
> +     {
> +       __builtin_free (oldrecmem);
> +       return;
> +     }
> +      __builtin_memcpy (recmem, oldrecmem, SIZE);    /* { dg-bogus 
> "accessing" } */
> +      baz (recmem);
> +      __builtin_free (oldrecmem);
> +    }
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (void)
> +{
> +  void *recmem = my_malloc (SIZE);
> +  baz (recmem);
> +  while (1)
> +    {
> +      void *oldrecmem = recmem;
> +      recmem = my_malloc (SIZE);
> +      if (!recmem)
> +     {
> +       __builtin_free (oldrecmem);
> +       return;
> +     }
> +      __builtin_memcpy (recmem, oldrecmem, SIZE);    /* { dg-bogus 
> "accessing" } */
> +      baz (recmem);
> +      __builtin_free (oldrecmem);
> +    }
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to