Hi! On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 12:26:41PM +0000, Kaushik Phatak wrote: > --- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 256400) > +++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy) > @@ -15799,8 +15799,10 @@ > exp, target, false); > case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX: > case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX_V4SI: > - return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4si_2op, > - exp, target, false); > + return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (((TARGET_64BIT) > + ? CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4si_2op > + : CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4si_internal), > + exp, target, false); > case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX_V8HI: > return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v8hi_2op, > exp, target, false);
I think you should use altivec_lvx_v4si_2op_si instead? And the same needs to be done for v8hi, v16qi, v4sf, maybe more? Segher
