> By QImode addition, do you mean: > > (set (subreg:QI (reg:SI X1) N) > (plus:QI (subreg:QI (reg:SI X2) N) > (subreg:QI (reg:SI X3) N))) > > ?
Yes. > I thought the point was instead that the target expected such ops > to be done on word_mode, even if the values involved are naturally QImode: > > (set (subreg:SI (reg:QI Y1) 0) > (plus:SI (subreg:SI (reg:QI Y2) 0) > (subreg:SI (reg:QI Y3) 0))) But that's not what the implementation of WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS does; IOW you'll get the above from expand_binop without the macro if there is no addqi. > Most RISC/WORD_REGISTER_OPERATIONS targets wouldn't provide QImode > addition patterns, so the first insn seems unlikely. Indeed, SImode on 64-bit RISC targets should have been more realistic, but I didn't want to give a 64-bit example. -- Eric Botcazou
