On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 05:40:09PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 9, 2018 5:08:24 PM GMT+01:00, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org>
> >Hi all,
> >in this PR, a dead reference to a function pointer cannot be optimized
> >out by the compiler because some ASAN_MARK UNPOISON calls, which are
> >placed before the store, cause the containing struct to escape.
> >(Without -fsanitize=address, the dead code is eliminated by the first
> >DSE pass).
> >The fix, which works at least for this testcase, is to copy part of the
> >sanopt dead code elimination pass early, so that the compiler can see
> >fewer UNPOISON calls. I am not sure this is general enough, due to
> >the very limited data flow analysis done by
> >Another possibility which I considered but did not implement is to mark
> >the UNPOISON calls so that they do not cause the parameter to escape.
> I'd do this, thus assign proper fnspec attributes to the asan functions.
It already uses ".R.." "fn spec".