On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On February 9, 2018 7:07:45 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
>>On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 07:01:08PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> >which indeed fixes the testcase and seems not to break asan.exp.
>>> Huh. Need to double check why that makes sense ;)
>>I think it does, for both ASAN_CHECK and ASAN_MARK the pointer argument
>>is the second one, the first one is an integer argument with flags.
>>And ASAN_MARK, both poison and unpoison, works kind like a clobber on
>>referenced variable, before unpoison it is generally inaccessible and
>>poison too.
> Ah, indeed.

Which was an approval as well, in case you want to push this right now.


> Richard.
>>       Jakub

Reply via email to