Hi Oleg, Sorry, for some reason your emails did not ended up in Inbox, I was quite surprized when Nick's email started with Hi Oleg.
>>Do you happen to have any other numbers on the resulting code >>size/speed? The original patch from DJ was present in my local sources since 4.7 so all the benchmarks (CSIBE etc.) were done on that version (when the patch was initially applied) Of course I re-tested the patch when I applied it to the trunk (but I didn't re-tested CSIBE) the only problem I spotted was the multiplication with the reciprocal. Best Regards, Sebastian > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Clifton [mailto:ni...@redhat.com] > Sent: 22 February 2018 15:41 > To: Oleg Endo <oleg.e...@t-online.de>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Sebastian Perta <sebastian.pe...@renesas.com>; 'DJ Delorie' > <d...@redhat.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] RX TARGET_RTX_COSTS function > > Hi Oleg, > > > Ping. > > Sorry - I am not very good at spotting RX bugs on the gcc-patches list. :-( > > >> gcc/ChangeLog: > >> * config/rx/rx.c (rx_rtx_costs): New function. > >> (TARGET_RTX_COSTS): Override to use rx_rtx_costs. > > Approved - please apply. > > Cheers > Nick >
