On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Martin Sebor <mse...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are many places in the C++ front-end where a string > enclosed in G_() is assigned to a pointer and later used > in a diagnostic call. Is there something different about > the usage I introduced that makes it unsuitable for > translation?
The difference is that you append to the string before it is used. Looks like the _ macro might work better in this case? Jason
