On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:59:27PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote: > >> So should we go with my original idea above? Or maybe we don't care > >> that we XFAIL on some targets since we're just going to remove the > >> test next release with the removal -maltivec=be? > > > > It would be nice to have clean test results, which is all this patch is > > about anyway, right? > > Ok, this XFAILs the test case and shouldn't create any extra noise when > it shouldn't. I also added the comment about no longer counting xxlor > insns. Better? > > Peter > > PR target/84534 > * gcc.target/powerpc/vec-setup-be-long.c: Add dg-xfail-run-if > on powerpc64le*-*-linux*.
(wrong indent: should be a tab and no extra spaces). Okay for trunk, thanks! Segher