On Monday 12 March 2018 03:26 PM, Richard Biener wrote: > Please use tree_int_cst_lt (rhs1, dstsize) instead. > >> + { >> + gimple_set_no_warning (stmt, true); > > Why this? There's only a single bit -- where do we warn from if you > don't do this here?
I incorrectly thought it was necessary to set that flag but I noticed now that it isn't. I'll remove it. > I also wonder why this code doesn't use range-info given the > INTEGER_CST constraints > range-info should tell us more than just handling MIN_EXPR? Right, I'll try using range-info. Thanks, Siddhesh