On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Andreas Krebbel wrote:

> Leaving history aside don't you agree that it would have been more 
> sensible to require a -m option only if you want to build for an ABI 
> different from what is currently mandated by the personality setting?

I agree with you.  But we can't leave history aside, so I'm having the 
same sentiment as Jakub.  The current situation is not good, but changing 
behaviour would be even worse.


Reply via email to