On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> wrote: >> > What is the reason for using different names for return and indirect >> > thunks at first place? >> > >> >> These 2 thunks are identical. But one may want to provide an >> alternate thunk only for >> indirect branch and leaves return thunk alone. You can't do that if >> both have the same >> name. > > Hmm, OK, what is the benefit to have two different thunks? It is just > safety precaution so we could adjust one without adjusting the other in > future? >
That is correct. -- H.J.
