On 3/14/18 4:27 PM, Kelvin Nilsen wrote: > @@ -14452,6 +14452,7 @@ altivec_expand_lv_builtin (enum insn_code icode, t > LVXL and LVE*X expand to use UNSPECs to hide their special behavior, > so the raw address is fine. */ > if (icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v2df_2op > + || icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v1ti_2op > || icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v2di_2op > || icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4sf_2op > || icode == CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4si_2op > @@ -15811,6 +15812,9 @@ altivec_expand_builtin (tree exp, rtx target, bool > case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX_V2DI: > return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v2di_2op, > exp, target, false); > + case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX_V1TI: > + return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v1ti_2op, > + exp, target, false); > case ALTIVEC_BUILTIN_LVX_V4SF: > return altivec_expand_lv_builtin (CODE_FOR_altivec_lvx_v4sf_2op, > exp, target, false);
FYI, these hunks will need updating due to the fix for PR83789 which I just committed to trunk. Peter
