On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 01:45:01PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2018, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 11:52:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> OK, thanks.
>
> > Note the testcase FAILs with -fconcepts when I do make check-c++-all,
>
> Hmm, I don't get that with check or check-g++. Should we expand the
> default std_list in g++-dg.exp, or should I manually test these
> additional variants?
I think we should add the -std=c++17 mode to the list of standards cycled by
default, now that it is a released standard. -fconcepts is experimental
and so is -std=c++2a, so perhaps those can stay out of the default and be
just checked occassionally.
The full set of check-c++-all FAILs I'm getting that don't show up with
check-g++ is:
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering-2.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering-2.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
errors, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
warnings, line 15)
FAIL: g++.dg/spellcheck-macro-ordering.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for
excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/pr84789.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for errors, line
12)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/pr84789.C -std=c++17 -fconcepts (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/string1.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/string1.C -std=gnu++2a (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/string1.C -std=gnu++17 -fconcepts (test for excess errors)
Jakub
