On 10/23/2011 11:05 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Eric Botcazou<ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote:
Anyway, the below appears to work for me. Eric shall I commit it?
I have other errors for config/i386/i386.c on my x86-64 machine. But are we
sure that we want to warn on
static unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT unknown[4] = { -1, -1, 0, 0 };
with -Wall? This seems overly picky to me.
The warning probably should not be in -Wall. It is fairly recent in C++, and I
think we should allow users to adapt before enabling it by default.
The issue is that we wanted -Wconversion to be enabled by -Wc++0x-compat
(after all, it's what the PR asks) but the latter is *already* in -Wall.
Personally, I would be in favor of taking -Wc++0x-compat out of -Wall.
Paolo.
