On Wed, 11 Apr 2018, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> When switching regcprop.c to use validate_* and apply_change_group,
> I have added code to restore recog_data.operands[i] if they have been
> replaced after apply_change_group failure.  That is bogus though, when
> apply_change_group fails, recog_data.insn is NULL and rest of recog_data
> structure is complete garbage; and nothing in copyprop_hardreg_forward_1
> seems to use it afterwards anyway, just will call extract_insn on the next
> insn.  Furthermore, the "fixups" were only for the recog_data structure
> operands itself, nothing else, the instruction itself has been already
> corrected by cancel_changes.
> 
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
> trunk?

OK.

Richard.

> 2018-04-11  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR rtl-optimization/85342
>       * regcprop.c (copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): Remove replaced array, use
>       a bool scalar var inside of the loop instead.  Don't try to update
>       recog_data.operand after failed apply_change_group.
> 
>       * gcc.target/i386/pr85342.c: New test.
> 
> --- gcc/regcprop.c.jj 2018-01-04 00:43:17.996703342 +0100
> +++ gcc/regcprop.c    2018-04-11 16:17:29.883575142 +0200
> @@ -751,7 +751,6 @@ copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (basic_block
>        bool is_asm, any_replacements;
>        rtx set;
>        rtx link;
> -      bool replaced[MAX_RECOG_OPERANDS];
>        bool changed = false;
>        struct kill_set_value_data ksvd;
>  
> @@ -934,7 +933,7 @@ copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (basic_block
>        eldest live copy that's in an appropriate register class.  */
>        for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++)
>       {
> -       replaced[i] = false;
> +       bool replaced = false;
>  
>         /* Don't scan match_operand here, since we've no reg class
>            information to pass down.  Any operands that we could
> @@ -951,26 +950,26 @@ copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (basic_block
>         if (recog_data.operand_type[i] == OP_IN)
>           {
>             if (op_alt[i].is_address)
> -             replaced[i]
> +             replaced
>                 = replace_oldest_value_addr (recog_data.operand_loc[i],
>                                              alternative_class (op_alt, i),
>                                              VOIDmode, ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC,
>                                              insn, vd);
>             else if (REG_P (recog_data.operand[i]))
> -             replaced[i]
> +             replaced
>                 = replace_oldest_value_reg (recog_data.operand_loc[i],
>                                             alternative_class (op_alt, i),
>                                             insn, vd);
>             else if (MEM_P (recog_data.operand[i]))
> -             replaced[i] = replace_oldest_value_mem (recog_data.operand[i],
> -                                                     insn, vd);
> +             replaced = replace_oldest_value_mem (recog_data.operand[i],
> +                                                  insn, vd);
>           }
>         else if (MEM_P (recog_data.operand[i]))
> -         replaced[i] = replace_oldest_value_mem (recog_data.operand[i],
> -                                                 insn, vd);
> +         replaced = replace_oldest_value_mem (recog_data.operand[i],
> +                                              insn, vd);
>  
>         /* If we performed any replacement, update match_dups.  */
> -       if (replaced[i])
> +       if (replaced)
>           {
>             int j;
>             rtx new_rtx;
> @@ -989,13 +988,6 @@ copyprop_hardreg_forward_1 (basic_block
>       {
>         if (! apply_change_group ())
>           {
> -           for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++)
> -             if (replaced[i])
> -               {
> -                 rtx old = *recog_data.operand_loc[i];
> -                 recog_data.operand[i] = old;
> -               }
> -
>             if (dump_file)
>               fprintf (dump_file,
>                        "insn %u: reg replacements not verified\n",
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85342.c.jj        2018-04-11 
> 16:25:50.564848408 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr85342.c   2018-04-11 16:26:05.534856581 
> +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +/* PR rtl-optimization/85342 */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target int128 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx512vl" } */
> +
> +typedef unsigned char U __attribute__((vector_size (64)));
> +typedef unsigned int V __attribute__((vector_size (64)));
> +typedef unsigned __int128 W __attribute__((vector_size (64)));
> +int i;
> +V g, h, z, k, l, m;
> +U j;
> +
> +W
> +bar (W o, W p)
> +{
> +  U q;
> +  o |= (W){q[0]} >= o;
> +  o += 1 < o;
> +  j |= (U){} == j;
> +  return i + (W)q + (W)g + (W)h + (W)z + o + (W)j + (W)k + (W)l + (W)m + p;
> +}
> +
> +W
> +foo (U u)
> +{
> +  U q;
> +  W r = bar ((W)(U){0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 
> ~0}, (W)q);
> +  u += (U)bar ((W){~0}, r);
> +  return (W)u;
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Felix Imendoerffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 
21284 (AG Nuernberg)

Reply via email to