On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:55:34PM +0000, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018, 1:31 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 09:28:43PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On the following new testcase we emit 2 different constexpr errors
> > > because of premature folding, where the PR44100 hack which is supposed
> > > to fold expressions like &((S *)0)->f or
> > > &((S *)24)->f folds all the &x->y expressions if x is TREE_CONSTANT
> > > into (some type)(x + cst) where what we were actually trying to access
> > > is lost.
> > >
> > > The following patch limits the offsetof-like expression hack to
> > expressions
> > > where maybe_constant_value of val's operand is INTEGER_CST, or e.g.
> > > a cast of INTEGER_CST to some pointer type.  This way we don't regress
> > > e.g. init/struct2.C, but don't mess up with x is e.g. some constexpr
> > > variable initialized to address of something.  Or should it avoid
> > > maybe_constant_value and just handle the literal INTEGER_CST and cast
> > > thereof?  We wouldn't handle &((S *)(24 + 8))->f that way though...
> >
> > Or shall we move this folding to cp_fold instead of cp_build_addr_expr_1
> > (while keeping it limited to INTEGER_CST pointers)?
> 
> 
> Yes, I think that would be better.

Ok, here is a patch that does that.  Compared to previous patch, the -O1 for
constexpr-nullptr-1.C is still needed, there is different diagnostics
(dereference of null) in constexpr-nullptr-2.C on two lines and two lines
that were commented due to this hack can now be handled.  Similarly,
array-size2.C XPASSes now, so removed the xfail in there.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2018-04-17  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR c++/84463
        * typeck.c (cp_build_addr_expr_1): Move handling of offsetof-like
        tricks from here to ...
        * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold) <case ADDR_EXPR>: ... here.  Only use it
        if INDIRECT_REF's operand is INTEGER_CST cast to pointer type.

        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C: Add -O1 to dg-options.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-2.C: Expect different diagnostics
        in two cases.  Uncomment two other tests and add expected dg-error for
        them.
        * g++.dg/init/struct2.C: Cast to int rather than long to avoid
        -Wnarrowing diagnostics on some targets for c++11.
        * g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C: Remove xfail.
        * g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-84463.C: New test.

--- gcc/cp/typeck.c.jj  2018-04-17 11:09:13.887127384 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/typeck.c     2018-04-17 18:00:17.616039746 +0200
@@ -5893,19 +5893,6 @@ cp_build_addr_expr_1 (tree arg, bool str
       return arg;
     }
 
-  /* ??? Cope with user tricks that amount to offsetof.  */
-  if (TREE_CODE (argtype) != FUNCTION_TYPE
-      && TREE_CODE (argtype) != METHOD_TYPE
-      && argtype != unknown_type_node
-      && (val = get_base_address (arg))
-      && COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val))
-      && INDIRECT_REF_P (val)
-      && TREE_CONSTANT (TREE_OPERAND (val, 0)))
-    {
-      tree type = build_pointer_type (argtype);
-      return fold_convert (type, fold_offsetof_1 (arg));
-    }
-
   /* Handle complex lvalues (when permitted)
      by reduction to simpler cases.  */
   val = unary_complex_lvalue (ADDR_EXPR, arg);
--- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c.jj     2018-04-17 11:09:13.886127383 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.c        2018-04-17 18:00:17.626039748 +0200
@@ -2215,6 +2215,28 @@ cp_fold (tree x)
       goto unary;
 
     case ADDR_EXPR:
+      loc = EXPR_LOCATION (x);
+      op0 = cp_fold_maybe_rvalue (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0), false);
+
+      /* Cope with user tricks that amount to offsetof.  */
+      if (op0 != error_mark_node
+         && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) != FUNCTION_TYPE
+         && TREE_CODE (TREE_TYPE (op0)) != METHOD_TYPE)
+       {
+         tree val = get_base_address (op0);
+         if (val
+             && INDIRECT_REF_P (val)
+             && COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (val))
+             && TREE_CONSTANT (TREE_OPERAND (val, 0)))
+           {
+             val = TREE_OPERAND (val, 0);
+             STRIP_NOPS (val);
+             if (TREE_CODE (val) == INTEGER_CST)
+               return fold_convert (TREE_TYPE (x), fold_offsetof_1 (op0));
+           }
+       }
+      goto finish_unary;
+
     case REALPART_EXPR:
     case IMAGPART_EXPR:
       rval_ops = false;
@@ -2232,6 +2254,7 @@ cp_fold (tree x)
       loc = EXPR_LOCATION (x);
       op0 = cp_fold_maybe_rvalue (TREE_OPERAND (x, 0), rval_ops);
 
+    finish_unary:
       if (op0 != TREE_OPERAND (x, 0))
        {
          if (op0 == error_mark_node)
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C.jj 2018-04-17 
11:09:13.697127292 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-1.C    2018-04-17 
18:00:17.705039771 +0200
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 // c++/67376 on gcc-patches for additional background.
 
 // { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
-// { dg-options "-fdelete-null-pointer-checks -fdump-tree-optimized" }
+// { dg-options "-O1 -fdelete-null-pointer-checks -fdump-tree-optimized" }
 
 // Runtime assert.  Used for potentially invalid expressions.
 #define RA(e)  ((e) ? (void)0 : __builtin_abort ())
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-2.C.jj 2016-08-06 
12:11:30.933757938 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-nullptr-2.C    2018-04-17 
18:12:41.445247860 +0200
@@ -192,12 +192,11 @@ constexpr bool b11 = ps >= (S*)0;
 constexpr S* ps1 = ps;
 constexpr S* ps2 = ps1;
 
-// The following aren't diagnosed due to a bug.
-// constexpr int* pi0 = &((S*)0)->i;
-// constexpr int* pi1 = &((S*)nullptr)->i;
+constexpr int* pi0 = &((S*)0)->i;      // { dg-error "null pointer|not a 
constant" }
+constexpr int* pi1 = &((S*)nullptr)->i;        // { dg-error "null pointer|not 
a constant" }
 
-constexpr int* pj0 = &((S*)0)->j;      // { dg-error "not a constant 
expression" }
-constexpr int* pj1 = &((S*)nullptr)->j;  // { dg-error "not a constant 
expression" }
+constexpr int* pj0 = &((S*)0)->j;      // { dg-error "null pointer|not a 
constant" }
+constexpr int* pj1 = &((S*)nullptr)->j;        // { dg-error "null pointer|not 
a constant" }
 
 constexpr int* psi = &ps->i;       // { dg-error "null pointer|not a constant" 
}
 constexpr int* psj = &ps->j;       // { dg-error "null pointer|not a constant" 
}
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/struct2.C.jj      2018-04-17 11:09:13.746127314 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/init/struct2.C 2018-04-17 18:00:17.750039783 +0200
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ void saveOrLoad() {
     };    
 
     SaveLoadEntry trackEntries = {
-       ((long) (__SIZE_TYPE__) (&((Track *) 42)->soundName[0])) - 42,
+       ((int) (__SIZE_TYPE__) (&((Track *) 42)->soundName[0])) - 42,
         0, 1
     };
     saveLoadEntries(&trackEntries);
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C.jj 2018-04-17 11:09:13.693127290 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/array-size2.C    2018-04-17 18:00:17.798039797 
+0200
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@ void
 foo (void)
 {
   char g[(char *) &((struct S *) 0)->b - (char *) 0]; // { dg-error "constant" 
}
-  char h[(__SIZE_TYPE__) &((struct S *) 8)->b];              // { dg-error 
"constant" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
+  char h[(__SIZE_TYPE__) &((struct S *) 8)->b];              // { dg-error 
"constant" }
   bar (g, h);
 }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-84463.C.jj     2018-04-17 
18:00:17.799039797 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-84463.C        2018-04-17 
18:00:17.799039797 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// PR c++/84463
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct S { int r; const unsigned char s[5]; };
+static constexpr S a[] = { { 0, "abcd" } };
+struct T { const unsigned char s[5]; };
+static constexpr T b[] = { { "abcd" } };
+
+constexpr int
+foo (const unsigned char *x)
+{
+  return x[0];
+}
+
+constexpr static const S *j = &a[0];
+constexpr static const int k = j->s[0];
+constexpr static int l = foo (a[0].s);
+constexpr static int m = foo (j->s);
+constexpr static const T *n = &b[0];
+constexpr static const int o = n->s[0];
+constexpr static int p = foo (b[0].s);
+constexpr static int q = foo (n->s);


        Jakub

Reply via email to