On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 4:04 PM Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:39:42PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 3:21 PM Bernd Edlinger <
> > wrote:
> > > Ping...
> > So this makes all traditional users go through the indirect
> > splay_tree_compare_wrapper
> > and friends (which is also exported for no good reason?). And all users
> > are traditional
> > at the moment.
> > So I wonder if it's better to have a complete alternate interface? I do
> > not see many
> > users besides gcc, there's a use in bfd elf32-xtensa.c and some uses in
> libgomp has a copy (intentionally so, it is slightly changed).
So if that is not exported ABI wise then maybe we can unshare it again
into an even more improved splay_tree2 in libiberty and deprecate the
DJ, how's "compatibility" supposed to work with libiberty?