On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 10:45:43AM -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> 2018-05-23 Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com>
>
> Implement P0614R1, Range-based for statements with initializer.
> * parser.c (cp_parser_range_based_for_with_init_p): New.
> (cp_parser_init_statement): Use it. Parse the optional init-statement
> for a range-based for loop.
> (cp_parser_skip_to_closing_parenthesis_1): Handle balancing ?:.
>
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for1.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for2.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for3.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for4.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for5.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for6.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp2a/range-for7.C: New test.
Could you please add some testcases that would test the handling of
structured bindings in these new forms of range for, like:
for (int i = 0; auto [ x, y ] : z)
but perhaps for completeness also in the init-stmt and perhaps both spots
too?
Jakub
